"ttyymmnn" (ttyymmnn)
09/09/2017 at 14:19 • Filed to: None | 0 | 9 |
I was searching for something on Oppo, and I came across this site. They linked to related posts I wrote for This Date in Aviation History. The entire main article looks like nothing more than a copy/paste of Wikipedia.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
For Sweden
> ttyymmnn
09/09/2017 at 14:25 | 1 |
Time to get an agent
CB
> ttyymmnn
09/09/2017 at 14:25 | 0 |
“Source: the Wikipedia URL”
Someone failed essay writing in high school. For multiple reasons.
ttyymmnn
> CB
09/09/2017 at 14:27 | 5 |
The thing reads like a Florida State football player’s homework assignment.
ttyymmnn
> For Sweden
09/09/2017 at 14:27 | 0 |
I’ve searched for old TDIAH articles before, and have found them popping up in other places, notably some Korean sites.
For Sweden
> ttyymmnn
09/09/2017 at 14:31 | 5 |
Time to get a Korean agent
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> ttyymmnn
09/09/2017 at 14:42 | 1 |
I’ve seen this before - which is to say, a whole-article reframe/copy-paste. I seem to recall that it’s explicitly okay - something about the open content licensing on Wikipedia and how it works, but I don’t remember the details.
aberson Bresident of the FullyAssed Committe
> ttyymmnn
09/09/2017 at 14:50 | 1 |
wow
ttyymmnn
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
09/09/2017 at 15:33 | 0 |
I did something similar on Oppo a couple of years ago, copying an entire news story with a link at the bottom. The author contacted Jalopnik (we were still attached to them) and complained. Hardigree actually went to bat for me.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> ttyymmnn
09/09/2017 at 16:11 | 1 |
Yep. Much easier scenario with Wikipedia - all the reuse rules are spelled out.